FocusOn Healthcare
  • Women's Health
  • Bone Health
  • Urology
  • Cardiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Neurology
  • Oncology
  • Resource Centers:
  • Women's Health
  • Bone Health
  • Urology
  • Cardiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Neurology
  • Oncology

Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and pathologic outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • May 2024
Urothelial Cancer Awareness Month Home Page

Read Full Article

Abstract

Background: UTUC is a rare malignancy with a poorer prognosis compared to bladder urothelial carcinoma. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard treatment for high-risk UTUC. Considering the decline in renal function with RNU and promising pathologic complete response rates from the phase II trial ECOG-ACRIN 8141, NAC has emerged as a favored perioperative treatment regimen for chemo-eligible patients with high-risk UTUC. However, RCTs exploring NAC's efficacy are absent, and large-scale studies examining NAC's role and predictors for its use are scarce. Methods: This study aimed to assess trends in NAC utilization, determinants for receiving NAC, and pathologic outcomes. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with high-grade cM0 UTUC treated with RNU from 2004-2019. Outcomes included pathologic response (pR) and pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ≤pT1pN0/X and pT0pN0/X, respectively. Multivariate regressions were adjusted for relevant patient and tumor characteristics. Results: Of 6,436 patients treated with RNU alone and 209 with RNU and NAC, older age, greater home distance from the treatment facility, and higher comorbidity scores decreased the likelihood of receiving NAC. In contrast, higher cT stage (OR 1.72, p=0.028) and cN+ status (OR 7.40, p<0.001) predicted NAC treatment. NAC was more commonly used in academic centers (OR 2.02, p<0.001). Use of NAC peaked in 2016 at 10%, but dropped to ~2% by 2019. There was minimal nodal response to NAC (23.4% cN+ vs 22.0% pN+). NAC was associated with 34.0% pR and 5.3% pCR rates, increasing the likelihood of pCR (OR 57.5, p<0.001). In cT2-4 UTUC, 19.3% and 7.1% of patients had pR and pCR with NAC, and NAC improved odds of pR (OR 1.78, p=0.024). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated variable NAC use for UTUC, illustrating the evolving landscape of perioperative systemic therapies. We report significant response rates even in cT2-4 UTUC. Our observed poor nodal response to NAC emphasizes the crucial role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in staging, regardless of NAC status. We note poor NAC utilization in non-academic settings and among patients living farther from care facilities, underscoring the need for improved care quality in the context of regionalization and multi-disciplinary approaches in UTUC management.

You might also like:

The biologic landscape and therapeutic implications of upper tract urothelial cancer

Germline genetic variants in cancers of the urothelial tract and association with outcomes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI).

Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Share

Modal body text goes here.

FocusOn logo
  • About FocusOn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer. All right reserved.

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More